Posts Tagged ‘California Council of Community Mental Health Agencies’

ACA Expands Health Coverage to Residents Formerly in Foster Care

Posted: Apr 29, 2014 | Posted by Kassy Perry | Comments Off on ACA Expands Health Coverage to Residents Formerly in Foster Care

California Healthline
April 29, 2014

A provision in the Affordable Care Act has made it more feasible for young adults who formerly were in foster care to gain coverage under Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program, HealthyCal reports.


Prior to the ACA, California extended Medi-Cal eligibility to former foster children up to age 21.

Under the ACA, those formerly in foster care now are eligible for Medi-Cal coverage until age 26. In addition, the law allows retroactive claims up to three months before the beginning of coverage.

The ACA also allows “uninterrupted eligibility,” which permits young adults to remain in the Medi-Cal program without re-registering each year.


Rusty Selix, executive director of the California Council of Community Mental Health Agencies, said Medi-Cal access is “incredibly important” for young adults who have left the foster care system.

Selix said that individuals formerly in foster care are at a higher risk for incarceration or homelessness. He added that such individuals tend to have health problems, including mental health and substance misuse issues.

Selix also noted that former foster care recipients are “probably going to be the hardest group to enroll, because they’re so disconnected from things and don’t know to take advantage of rights that they have.” He added, “It is a population that, without that [access to insurance], it was almost impossible to give them the help they need. Now, the funding is there, and it’s just a matter of linking them to the services” (Richard, HealthyCal, 4/28).
Read the full story here.

Case Study: Proposition 63 – Mental Health Services Act

Posted: Jan 7, 2011 | Posted by Kassy Perry | No Comments

Changing Perception to Validate Reality

Although polling for a tax to fund statewide mental health services indicated voter support, there was little guarantee that Proposition 63 would pass. Even with one in five Americans living with mental illness, social stigma had muffled public dialog about the human and economic benefits of prevention, early diagnosis and community-based treatment. Combined with a general disdain for more taxes that seemed to be providing fewer services, this created the need for a campaign to untangle a knot that ironically tied public sympathy and antipathy together.

Through a carefully planned media strategy PCG enabled the California Council of Community Mental Health Agencies to create a connection with voters, ultimately attracting widespread support. Media training with spokespersons was important; and message training was critical. PCG evaluated voter sentiment and identified and placed the most relatable spokespersons in specifically targeted markets. Messages were tailored to influence various audiences, appealing to their pocketbook or social conscience as appropriate, and showcasing personal stories to powerfully connect voters to the cause.